Lab Notes

The Quarch Chronicles

Why I measure power alongside performance, and what the numbers show about a drive that speed charts hide.

On this page 2 sections

A speed chart is the part of an SSD review people read first, and it tells the least about living with the drive. Battery life and the way a drive behaves when it has nothing to do sit in a different measurement.

A drive's power over time: idle, then a burst of work with a peak and an average, then idle againA line chart without numbers. The power line sits low at idle, jumps up while the drive works, wobbles around an average level with one peak, then drops back to idle. Three dashed marks name the peak, the average and the idle level.BLOG / LAB NOTESPower next to speedWHAT A QUARCH CAPTURE ADDS TO A SPEED CHARTPowerTimePEAKAVERAGEIDLE

I collect that measurement alongside performance in my reviews for Tom’s Hardware, and several drives looked very different once I did. Some of the faster ones, like the WD Blue SN570, gave back part of their lead in efficiency. Idle draw, which no throughput chart shows, also separated drives more than I expected, as the Intel Optane P5800X shows below.

Power is half the story

Throughput charts tell you how fast a drive can go. They say very little about what it costs to get there. That is why I capture power in my reviews, alongside performance.

Surfers and a paddleboarder in open blue water around a small breaking wave, under a pale, clear sky.

I use a Quarch HD Programmable Power Module to measure a drive’s draw directly, then compare idle, average and peak power against the work the drive did. Idle draw deserves more attention than it gets, since some SSDs consume watts at idle, while better ones sip just milliwatts. In a laptop, that difference decides how long you can work away from the charger.

Efficiency is not the same as low power draw. My Kingston KC3000 review makes the argument: a drive that uses more power during a task can still come out ahead if it finishes sooner and drops back to idle.

Power is half the story

Two ways to finish the same job

Two panels, each a power line over time with no numbers. Panel 1, lower power and slower: the line rises to a lower level, stays there for most of the time axis, then drops to idle. Panel 2, race to sleep: the line rises to a higher level, stays there for a shorter time, drops to idle and stays at idle for the rest of the axis. The area under each line is shaded.01 LOWER POWER, SLOWERPowerTimeDoneTask runningIdle02 RACE TO SLEEPPowerTimeDoneTask runningIdle
Figure 1 · Both drives do the same work. The drive on the right draws more power while it runs, finishes sooner and sits at idle for the rest of the time. Illustrative values.

This is the race-to-sleep idea, and performance per watt is how I score it. I think the best controller is the one that knows when to rest.

What the numbers showed

A few examples from my reviews. The WD Blue SN570 was faster than the SN550, but it drew roughly half a watt more on average. That higher draw and weak file transfer performance gave it a relatively low efficiency score, even though its idle draw dropped by roughly 100mW. The Kingston KC3000 beat several other Gen4 drives on efficiency, though the WD Black SN850 and Samsung 980 Pro were both more efficient. The Intel Optane P5800X idled at roughly 3.3W and drew over 15W under load.

Looking up at five large bell-shaped rocket engine nozzles on a rocket stage, displayed inside a tall building with blue steel framing.

In my laptop upgrade test, a Dell Inspiron 15 5502 running MobileMark 2018, the WD Black SN850 ran for over 8.5 hours on a single charge and the Samsung 980 Pro for nearly 9.5, while the Phison E18 drives I tested ended the run hours earlier.

What the numbers showed

Power readings from my reviews

Three panels of readings from the author's reviews. Panel 1, idle and load: the Intel Optane P5800X idled at roughly 3.3W and drew over 15W under load. Panel 2, efficiency: the WD Blue SN570 drew roughly half a watt more on average than the SN550 and scored relatively low on efficiency. Panel 3, on battery in one laptop: the WD Black SN850 ran over 8.5 hours, the Samsung 980 Pro nearly 9.5 hours, and the Phison E18 drives ended the run hours earlier.01 IDLE AND LOADIntel OptaneP5800XIdleroughly 3.3WUnder loadover 15WQuarch HD capture02 EFFICIENCYWD Blue SN570vs SN550Average drawhalf a watt moreEfficiency scorerelatively lowFaster, higher draw03 ON BATTERYDell laptop,one chargeWD Black SN850over 8.5 hoursSamsung 980 Pronearly 9.5 hoursPhison E18 driveshours earlierSame laptop
Figure 2 · The same Quarch capture that shows speed also shows idle draw, efficiency and how long a laptop lasts. Source: Sean Webster, Tom's Hardware reviews of the Optane P5800X and WD Blue SN570, and the PCIe 4.0 laptop upgrade test.

I describe how I run these captures on a validation bench in How I Made SSD Validation Repeatable. Flash Foundations, Part 5 covers what a power trace can reveal about a controller. Both go further than this page does. Start with whichever matches what you want to measure.

Sources

Primary is the original paper, standard or datasheet. Secondary is a review, a vendor summary or a news report. Measured is my own test data.

Show all 1 sources
  • MeasuredThe author’s own measurements